By MARI YAMAGUCHI
Handrails run down the middle of the hallway to help prisoners make their way from one end to the other. Adult diapers are neatly stacked in a corner. When an inmate chokes on his rice and coughs, a supervisor rushes over to rub his back.
Welcome to the world of old-age prisons. Japan's population is aging faster than anywhere else, and with that has come an even sharper rise in elderly inmates.
The number of Japanese prisoners aged 60 or older has doubled over the past decade to more than 10,000. That outpaces a 30 percent increase in the general population for that age group. The elderly now represent 16 percent of the nation's inmates.
Full Article
This blog tracks aging and disability news. Legislative information is provided via GovTrack.us.
In the right sidebar and at the page bottom, bills in the categories of Aging, Disability, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security are tracked.
Clicking on the bill title will connect to GovTrack updated bill status.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Friday, December 3, 2010
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Stool Test Called Most Cost-Effective Colon Cancer Screen from MedPage Today
Fecal immunochemical testing every year came out on top in a cost-effectiveness analysis of the major colorectal cancer screening tests in average-risk North Americans, researchers said.
A computer model using published cost and efficacy data for eight different screening approaches indicated that fecal immunochemical testing, or FIT, conducted annually would lead to the fewest cancer cases and deaths and with the lowest cost, according to Braden J. Manns, of the University of Calgary in Alberta, and colleagues.
In a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 average-risk individuals, 1,393 screened with FIT would eventually be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 457 would die, given mid-range assumptions about cost and efficacy, at a cost of $1,797 per person diagnosed, they reported online in Public Library of Science Medicine.
The same cohort would develop 1,796 to 4,857 colorectal cancers if screened with other modalities -- including fecal occult blood testing, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography, two types of fecal DNA testing, and no screening -- and 593 to 1,782 deaths would result, Manns and colleagues determined.
Costs of screening and management would average from $1,864 to $2,667 per person with the other strategies.
Full Article
A computer model using published cost and efficacy data for eight different screening approaches indicated that fecal immunochemical testing, or FIT, conducted annually would lead to the fewest cancer cases and deaths and with the lowest cost, according to Braden J. Manns, of the University of Calgary in Alberta, and colleagues.
In a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 average-risk individuals, 1,393 screened with FIT would eventually be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 457 would die, given mid-range assumptions about cost and efficacy, at a cost of $1,797 per person diagnosed, they reported online in Public Library of Science Medicine.
The same cohort would develop 1,796 to 4,857 colorectal cancers if screened with other modalities -- including fecal occult blood testing, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography, two types of fecal DNA testing, and no screening -- and 593 to 1,782 deaths would result, Manns and colleagues determined.
Costs of screening and management would average from $1,864 to $2,667 per person with the other strategies.
Full Article
Commission's final deficit report preserves controversial spending cuts
The leaders of President Obama's fiscal commission released a final report Wednesday that is full of political dynamite, recommending sharp cuts in military spending, a higher retirement age and reforms that could cost the average taxpayer an extra $1,700 a year.
. . .
The plan recommends raising taxes by nearly $1 trillion by 2020, primarily through tax reforms that would eliminate or reduce cherished reductions including the deduction for home mortgage interest; the tax-free treatment of employer-paid health insurance; and preferred rates for capital gains and dividends.
It also calls for a 15-cent hike in the federal gas tax. The top income tax rate for both individuals and corporations would be dramatically lowered, however, from 35 percent to 29 percent or less. And the report recommends a legislative trigger that would raise taxes automatically unless a comprehensive overhaul is approved by 2013.
Future retirees would also face significant sacrifices, including higher Medicare premiums and a retirement age that would rise to 69 by 2075. The early retirement age would rise from 62 to 64.
Full Article
. . .
The plan recommends raising taxes by nearly $1 trillion by 2020, primarily through tax reforms that would eliminate or reduce cherished reductions including the deduction for home mortgage interest; the tax-free treatment of employer-paid health insurance; and preferred rates for capital gains and dividends.
It also calls for a 15-cent hike in the federal gas tax. The top income tax rate for both individuals and corporations would be dramatically lowered, however, from 35 percent to 29 percent or less. And the report recommends a legislative trigger that would raise taxes automatically unless a comprehensive overhaul is approved by 2013.
Future retirees would also face significant sacrifices, including higher Medicare premiums and a retirement age that would rise to 69 by 2075. The early retirement age would rise from 62 to 64.
Full Article
Related articles
- Americans grapple with how much should be sacrificed by whom (theglobeandmail.com)
- Social Security Cuts Are Part of Deficit Plan (politics.usnews.com)
- Deficit panel's painful budget draws challenges (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
Medical News: Fish Oil May Thwart Advanced AMD - in Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology from MedPage Today
Eating fish and shellfish high in omega-3 fatty acids may protect against the development of advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in older patients, researchers found.
In a study of Medicare beneficiaries living in Maryland, patients with advanced AMD were significantly less likely to eat at least one serving of seafood high in omega-3 fatty acids a week than healthy controls (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8), according to Bonnielin Swenor, MPH, of the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and colleagues.
The findings, which were reported online in Ophthalmology, are consistent with other recent epidemiological studies suggesting an inverse association between fish consumption and risk of AMD, including the Blue Mountain Eye Study and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
Full Article
In a study of Medicare beneficiaries living in Maryland, patients with advanced AMD were significantly less likely to eat at least one serving of seafood high in omega-3 fatty acids a week than healthy controls (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8), according to Bonnielin Swenor, MPH, of the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and colleagues.
The findings, which were reported online in Ophthalmology, are consistent with other recent epidemiological studies suggesting an inverse association between fish consumption and risk of AMD, including the Blue Mountain Eye Study and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
Full Article
NCPSSM: National Committee President/CEO Barbara Kennelly’s Statement on Fiscal Commission Report Release (12.01.10)
If we’re truly concerned about the future of middle-class America, then strengthening Social Security by closing its modest funding gap is a critical first step. But the policy choices we make in strengthening Social Security should be guided by what’s good for the program and not what’s wrong with the budget. Washington must stop ignoring the critical role Social Security continues to play for older Americans, their families and the economy as a whole. This report does not meet that very basic standard of fiscal fairness and that is why it should not receive the 14 required commission votes to proceed. ”…Barbara B. Kennelly, President/CEO
The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff. The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better-informed citizens and voters.
Related articles
- U.S. debt-reduction needs a political champion (theglobeandmail.com)
- Deficit Plan Wins Bipartisan Support (online.wsj.com)
- Why Obama's latest bid to control national debt might not change anything - Christian Science Monitor (news.google.com)
- Gov't: No Increase for Social Security Next Year (abcnews.go.com)
FDA Panel Rejects Prostate Drugs for CA Prevention from MedPage Today
An FDA advisory panel has voted overwhelmingly that GlaxoSmithKline's dutasteride (Avodart) and Merck's finasteride (Proscar) should not be used to prevent prostate cancer because the drugs are linked to a higher incidence of high-grade tumors.
Although the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors were shown to prevent low-risk cancers better than placebo, clinical trials painted a disturbing link between both drugs and an increased incidence of higher-risk prostate cancers.
Full Artidle
Although the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors were shown to prevent low-risk cancers better than placebo, clinical trials painted a disturbing link between both drugs and an increased incidence of higher-risk prostate cancers.
Full Artidle
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Message from Assistant Secretary Greenlee on World AIDS Day, December 1
Since 1988, World AIDS Day has been celebrated on December 1 around the world. Over the years, it has become one of the most recognized international health days and a key opportunity to raise awareness and bring attention to prevention and treatment services. Twenty-four percent of people living with HIV nationwide are over the age of 50 and research indicates that by 2015 half of the people living with HIV in the U.S. will be over age 50. On top of that, we now know that fifteen percent of new cases occur among people aged 50 and older.
For these reasons, it is critical that the Aging Services Network participate in activities, including World AIDS Day, to raise awareness about HIV/AIDS among older adults and their caregivers. Aging services providers and HIV care providers must work together to educate older Americans about the prevention of HIV as well as to ensure that the special needs of the older men and women living with HIV can be effectively addressed in an integrated and collaborative fashion.
Please join the Administration on Aging on December 1st in recognizing World AIDS Day.
New Study Cites Reasons for PACE Effectiveness
Programs of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly effective in keeping seniors out of nursing homes
•Development of a comprehensive patient assessment that includes a complete review of all medical, psychosocial, lifestyle and values issues
•Creation and implementation of an evidenced-based plan of care that address all of the patient’s health needs.
•Communication and coordination with all who provide care for the patient.
•Promotion of the patient’s (and their family caregiver’s) engagement in their own health care.
Alexandria, VA – Programs of All-inclusive Care for
the Elderly (PACE) were one of three programs researchers identified
as models of long term care that are effective, efficient and less
expensive than traditional long term care in a study whose findings
appear in the most recent issue of the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA, November 3, 2010).
“PACE
organizations are proud of our success in keeping older adults with
long term care needs living in the community,” said National PACE
Association President and CEO Shawn Bloom. “This study helps to
explain some of the reasons why PACE is able to help so many families
who are challenged to find the best care possible for their older loved
ones.”
The researchers
examined all peer-reviewed studies of comprehensive primary care models
for older adults with multiple conditions published between 1999-2010.
From this review, they identified four processes that are present in
most successful models of primary care for these patients:
•Development of a comprehensive patient assessment that includes a complete review of all medical, psychosocial, lifestyle and values issues
•Creation and implementation of an evidenced-based plan of care that address all of the patient’s health needs.
•Communication and coordination with all who provide care for the patient.
•Promotion of the patient’s (and their family caregiver’s) engagement in their own health care.
“PACE
is innovative because it allows a team of health and service
professionals to take responsibility for all aspects of a senior’s
care,” Bloom said. “Because our payment does not change based on the
services we provide , we can be creative in delivering care and service
focused on the unique needs of each older adult and their family in the
right place, in the right measure and at the right time.”
PACE
is both financially and clinically responsible for enrollees when they
need hospital or nursing home care. The all-inclusive nature of PACE
provides financial incentives to provide less expensive primary and
preventive care.
“In
PACE the financial incentives are aligned with the clinical incentives,”
Bloom said. “We have found the flexibility this allows providers is
essential when caring for older individuals who often have complex
clinical and social needs.”
PACE
programs serve persons who are 55 and older, live in the PACE service
area, need a nursing home level of care, and are able to live safely in
the community at the time of enrollment. PACE has been successful at
enabling enrollees to continue living in the community by utilizing an
interdisciplinary team that both plans and delivers care for each
enrollee and a risk-based financing model that rewards effective
provision of preventive and primary care. PACE organizations are
responsible for all the care and services that each enrollee needs,
including hospital stays and nursing home placement.
PACE
is funded through Medicare, Medicaid and private finances. It has been
a recognized provider type since 1997. Currently there are 75 PACE
sponsors operating in 29 states with more programs on the way.
The
study was conducted by lead researchers Chad Boult, MD, MPH, MBA, Johns
Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD and G. Darryl Wieland,
PhD, MPH, research director of Geriatrics Services at Richland Hospital,
Columbia, SC and USC Department of Medicine’s Clinical Geriatrics
faculty.
About NPA:
The
National PACE Association works to advance the efforts of Programs of
All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) to support, maintain,
safeguard and promote the provision of quality, comprehensive and
cost-effective health care services for frail older adults. More
information on NPA and PACE is available at www.npaonline.org.Related articles
- American Geriatrics Society Names AARP President Jennie Chin Hansen Its New CEO (eon.businesswire.com)
- On Lok Looks to Expand PACE Model of Long-Term Care to Rural California Through Grant (eon.businesswire.com)
- Should Long-Term-Care Insurance Be Part of Health Reform? (time.com)
Will Congress Repeal Health Care Reform?
by Barbara O'Brian
As soon as Republicans knew they had won a majority of House seats in the midterm elections, GOP leaders vowed to repeal health care reform. Can they do this? And should they?
Frankly, chances that the health care reform bill could be repealed completely are remote, especially since such repeal would have to override President Obama's veto, and the Senate still has a Democratic majority.
House Republicans say they have some tricks up their sleeves, such as refusing to provide funds in the budget to implement health care reform. However, provisions of the law that will expand Medicaid and help subsidize private insurance won't kick in until 2014. Until then, there's not much the House can do to the budget to stop health care reform from going forward, short of defunding the entire Health and Human Services department.
Another "trick" might be to dismantle the bill piece by piece. One provision that many people want to remove is the individual mandate, which will require most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty. This provision also kicks in in 2014, and it's one that Baby Boomers in particular will want to fight to keep.
Here's why: Beginning in 2014, private insurance companies will no longer be able to refuse to insure someone because of a pre-existing condition. But without an individual mandate, there will be no incentive for younger and healthier people to purchase health insurance until the time comes when they need it. This means those left in the insurance "risk pool" will be older, and that drives up the cost of insurance.
By the time we reach 50, nearly all of us have "pre-existing conditions." Some of our conditions are common, and some are not -- mesothelioma, for example, is rarely diagnosed in patients younger than 50. And without Medicare or other good insurance, mesothelioma treatment would be financially devastating.
But without the individual mandate requiring that healthier people share in the cost of insuring all of us, the health insurance premium bills for people aged 50 to 65 will be ruinous. We can scrap health care reform entirely, of course, but keep in mind that if you lose your insurance before you reach Medicare age you may not be able to purchase insurance at all, at any price, if you have a pre-existing condition.
As soon as Republicans knew they had won a majority of House seats in the midterm elections, GOP leaders vowed to repeal health care reform. Can they do this? And should they?
Frankly, chances that the health care reform bill could be repealed completely are remote, especially since such repeal would have to override President Obama's veto, and the Senate still has a Democratic majority.
House Republicans say they have some tricks up their sleeves, such as refusing to provide funds in the budget to implement health care reform. However, provisions of the law that will expand Medicaid and help subsidize private insurance won't kick in until 2014. Until then, there's not much the House can do to the budget to stop health care reform from going forward, short of defunding the entire Health and Human Services department.
Another "trick" might be to dismantle the bill piece by piece. One provision that many people want to remove is the individual mandate, which will require most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty. This provision also kicks in in 2014, and it's one that Baby Boomers in particular will want to fight to keep.
Here's why: Beginning in 2014, private insurance companies will no longer be able to refuse to insure someone because of a pre-existing condition. But without an individual mandate, there will be no incentive for younger and healthier people to purchase health insurance until the time comes when they need it. This means those left in the insurance "risk pool" will be older, and that drives up the cost of insurance.
By the time we reach 50, nearly all of us have "pre-existing conditions." Some of our conditions are common, and some are not -- mesothelioma, for example, is rarely diagnosed in patients younger than 50. And without Medicare or other good insurance, mesothelioma treatment would be financially devastating.
But without the individual mandate requiring that healthier people share in the cost of insuring all of us, the health insurance premium bills for people aged 50 to 65 will be ruinous. We can scrap health care reform entirely, of course, but keep in mind that if you lose your insurance before you reach Medicare age you may not be able to purchase insurance at all, at any price, if you have a pre-existing condition.
Related articles
- No Mandate For Repeal Of Healthcare Law (alan.com)
- Eric Cantor: Never Mind On That Health Care Reform Repeal (oliverwillis.com)
- Health-law advocates fear effect of repeal (dispatch.com)
- Cantor: We'll have a preexisting conditions provision in our new health-care plan too (hotair.com)
- Wendell Potter: Why Health Care Reform Will Survive (crooksandliars.com)
- The 1099 Logjam and the Future of Health Reform (swampland.blogs.time.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













