By Paula Span
What do we know, or think we know, about the way we respond when a loved one dies?
We pass with the dying through the Kübler-Ross stages — denial, anger and so forth. We realize that people who seem happy or even crack jokes after a terrible loss are faking it and that we will pay a psychological price for not dutifully attending to our own “grief work.” We seek therapy or grief counseling, and if we would rather not, we berate ourselves for living in a harmful state of denial.
But scientists have studied the reactions of thousands of people to loss in the decades since Elizabeth Kübler-Ross, who worked with terminally ill patients, postulated her theories about moving from one distinct, predictable phase of grief to the next. One of the most prominent bereavement researchers — George A. Bonanno, a clinical psychologist who is chairman of the counseling and clinical psychology department at Teachers College at Columbia University — has just published an intriguing and reassuring exploration of what they had learned. Among the findings is that all the widespread assumptions about mourning I just mentioned are fallacious.
Continue Reading
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=3cc8e08c-d50c-46b3-b476-96a181534c06)
No comments:
Post a Comment