Imagine your loved one is very sick in the ICU.   So sick that the ICU  doctor believes that there is only a very small chance of survival, and  even if your loved one survived, he/she would have significant,  permanent disability.  If you were placed in this position, how would  you want to make decisions about continued intensive medical treatments  to support his/her life?  Would you want to make it on your own?  Would  you want to share the responsibility for this decision with the ICU  doctor?  Would you just want the ICU doctor to make the decision for you  with our without your opinion?
Now imagine we ask the same questions to surrogate decision makers of  critically ill, incapacitated adults.   How do you think they would  answer?  We now have some idea of how thanks to a study authored by Sara Johnson and her colleagues at UCSF and University of Pittsburgh. 
The study, currently in press but accessible early online,  presented two clinical vignettes to 230 surrogate decision-makers for  incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of death.   One vignette was based on a decision regarding life support similar to  the one described above, and the other was about selection of specific  antibiotic agents to treat an infection.
Full Article

 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment