Showing posts with label EEOC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EEOC. Show all posts

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Workers with Intellectual Disabilities Abused by Texas-Based Company for Years - Disability.gov


The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a lawsuit against Hill Country Farms alleging the company subjected a group of 31 men with intellectual disabilities to severe abuse and discrimination for more than 20 years.
The complaint alleges that that the owners and staffers of Henry’s Turkey denied the workers lawful wages, paying them only $65 a month for full-time work; subjected them to abusive verbal and physical harassment; restricted their freedom of movement; and imposed other harsh terms and conditions of employment such as requiring them to live in deplorable and sub-standard living conditions, and failing to provide adequate medical care when needed.
Verbal abuses included frequently referring to the workers as “retarded,” “dumb ass” and “stupid.” Class members reported acts of physical abuse including hitting, kicking, at least one case of handcuffing, and forcing the workers with disabilities to carry heavy weights as punishment.
This conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended by the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (ADAAA).
The lawsuit follows an EEOC Commission meeting held March 15, 2011 that explored the issue of discrimination on the basis of mental disabilities.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, April 1, 2011

Employment-Supportive Personal Assistance Services (E-PAS) Facilitate Employment of Persons with Serious Physical and Mental Disabilities - Disability.gov

By Raymond E. Glazier, Ph.D., Director of the Abt Associates Center for the Advancement of Rehabilitation and Disability Services and Member of the MA Work Without Limits Initiative in Disability.gov

Persons like me with serious physical, intellectual or psychiatric disabilities often can’t function productively in the workplace without some form of assistance. This is not to say that we can’t perform, quite capably, the essential functions of many jobs. Instead these, oftentimes, very simple accommodations (such as personal assistance services) help us go about our daily routines more efficiently.

What Are Employment-Supportive Personal Assistance Services (E-PAS)?

Personal assistance services (PAS) are defined as assistance with everyday tasks that a person would typically perform for him/herself, were it not for the disability (ODEP, 2006). These services can include in-home assistance with bathing, grooming and dressing to get ready for the workday. In the employment context, PAS does not include routinely performing the employee’s essential job functions.

Employment-Supportive Personal Assistance Services, or E-PAS, supports people with disabilities engaging in competitive employment. E-PAS can involve personal care services performed at a workplace – for example, help eating a meal, preparing for the workday and/or getting to and from the workplace. It may also encompass job coaching, which is not always thought of as PAS.

For a worker with quadriplegia, the assistance needs might include personal care tasks like feeding or toileting at the worksite, as well as help with traveling to and from the job and task-related assistance with copying documents and perhaps, filing and retrieving papers.

For an employee with cognitive limitations, needs might include assistance with organizing work tasks, becoming acclimated to a work schedule and learning one’s way around the workplace.

For a worker with serious mental health issues, there could be a need for cueing services like medication reminders, guidance in relating appropriately to co-workers or help with interacting with supervisors.

Medicaid as a PAS/E-PAS Funding Source

Most persons with significant disabilities are in no position to pay privately for PAS, and neither Medicare nor private health insurance will cover it – even for vital personal care needs like in-home assistance with transfers, bathing, toileting and dressing, not to mention cueing services for persons with mental health issues or workplace PAS services. The only funding sources for personal care PAS are Medicaid (which goes by different names in different states) and the Veterans Administration for those with military service-connected disabilities.

Medicaid is a joint federal-state health care program that funds services for eligible low-income/low resource individuals and families. While there is a federally mandated set of basic core services, eligibility rules and additional optional services vary from state to state. Coverage for personal care services is a state plan option that is offered by two thirds of states and does not always extend to cueing services (even though the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has reimbursed them for many years.)

Several states have explicit Medicaid E-PAS programs designed to facilitate competitive employment for persons with disabilities. California, Connecticut, Kansas, New Jersey, Nebraska and Wisconsin come to mind; Utah also has a remarkable E-PAS program targeting consumers with mental health issues.

Ordinarily, working individuals have incomes that put them over the usual income threshold for Medicaid eligibility. However, most states have a Medicaid Buy-In program that allows working persons with disabilities to become eligible for the broad array of Medicaid services by paying a monthly premium. Again, there is much variability state to state as to the minimum required work effort, services covered, premium rate structures, etc.

Other Types of E-PAS and Who Pays for What

Certain E-PAS items, like job coaching, are the province of the state operated, state/federally funded Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) programs, which also have income and asset limits for eligibility. The state VR programs have finite funding that limits the number of consumers they can serve in a given fiscal year. Therefore, the federal Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) requires that they serve persons with ‘most significant disabilities’ first.

While Medicaid may cover travel to and from the workplace, as well as on-site personal care services like feeding and toileting needed during the workday, employers are required by Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, as amended, to fund personal care services during work-related company travel. And importantly, ADA ‘reasonable accommodations’ required of employers also extend to task-related PAS with non-essential job functions like copying, mailing, filing, etc.

The following table summarizes the three main areas of E-PAS and who funds them. Obviously there are gray areas, and the distinctions between each category and responsible party are not always clear-cut.

Three Categories of Workplace PAS/Three Funding Sources
Medicaid-funded Personal Care PAS:
Help getting to/from worksite, personal care (mobility, feeding, toileting) at the worksite, cueing services for those with serious mental health issues.
Employer Reasonable Accommodation PAS (per ADA):
Task assistance, e.g., ASL inter-preter, filing help, scribe; personal care only for job-related travel.
Vocational Rehabilitation PAS:
Job Coach (helps organize tasks and processes; advocates for worker)/Supportive Employment.

How to Identify E-PAS Resources Available to You

Your VR counselor or Club House are likely sources for assistance in determining your needed employment supports and how to obtain what E-PAS you require in order to achieve competitive employment.

You can also visit the websites of the Center for Personal Assistance Services, the Job Accommodation Network or Disability.gov to learn more about personal assistance services and other types of workplace accommodations.

Raymond E. Glazier, Ph.D., Director of the Abt Associates Center for the Advancement of Rehabilitation and Disability Services in Cambridge, MA receives in-home PAS through the MA Medicaid Buy-In; his employer provides additional service hours at the same wages for two of his home PAS workers to provide task-related E-PAS at the office.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Lawsuit Settled with Company for Unlawfully Refusing to Hire Applicant Who Participated in Drug Rehab Program - Disability.gov

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged Hussey Copper, Ltd. with refusing to hire an applicant because of his participation in a medically supervised drug rehabilitation program. Refusing to hire a qualified individual because of his or her disability, record of disability or because the employer perceives a person as having a disability, violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. For examples of other civil rights enforcement actions visit http://www.disability.gov/civil_rights/enforcement_actions.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553b385be8833014e5f38300e970c
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, August 29, 2009

U.P.S. Is Sued Over Disabilities Policy - NYTimes.com

A federal agency has sued United Parcel Service, accusing it of violating federal law by limiting workers’ ability to take medical leave. In a lawsuit filed Thursday in a federal court in Chicago, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said U.P.S. had since at least 2002 had an “inflexible” 12-month leave policy that did not provide for “reasonable accommodation” for disabled employees and instead called for their termination. The agency accused UPS of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act and federal civil rights law.

Business Briefing - Legal - U.P.S. Is Sued Over Disabilities Policy - NYTimes.com

Friday, July 11, 2008

Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability

SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) is publishing this final rule to amend its regulation to establish that all complaints under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (section 508), whether filed by members of the public or EEOC employees, will be processed under the procedures for section 504 public complaints. This final rule also updates the terminology used to describe how EEOC enforces section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act with respect to its own programs or activities. Finally, the final rule updates or eliminates certain sections of this regulation that are no longer relevant.