Showing posts with label IRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IRA. Show all posts

Sunday, October 17, 2010

New Small Business Law Could Have Big Effect On Retirement Accounts

A new law aimed at helping stimulate small business job growth through tax deductions could have major consequences for anyone with a retirement savings account at work, a University of Illinois expert on taxation and elder law notes.

Law professor Richard L. Kaplan says an obscure provision in the recently enacted Small Business Jobs Act allows 401(k), 403(b) or 457 account holders to convert their retirement savings into a tax-advantaged Roth-version of the same account.

The good news, according to Kaplan, is that by converting to a Roth variant, income can grow completely tax-free because no tax is assessed when funds are withdrawn from a Roth account during retirement.

The bad news: Those who convert retirement savings account to Roth plans must report the amount converted as income, a move that could potentially bump them up into a higher tax bracket.


Source: Phil Ciciora University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Full Article
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 14, 2010

Why You Shouldn't Convert to a Roth IRA - WSJ.com

As 2009 came to a close, financial advisers geared up for an expected flood of clients looking to convert their traditional individual retirement accounts to Roth IRAs this year.

Conversions are indeed way up from previous years, thanks to the elimination of the income limit for those wanting to make the switch. But many clients who had expressed interest are deciding not to convert.
Conversion is attractive mainly because withdrawals from Roth IRAs, unlike those from traditional IRAs, are tax-free.

Moreover, Roth IRAs also have no withdrawal requirements; traditional IRAs require investors to begin making withdrawals at age 59½. Several brokerage firms saw conversions by their clients quadruple in the first quarter of 2010, compared with the year-earlier quarter.

However, financial advisers are finding that most clients wouldn't benefit, on balance, from a conversion. Here are the main reasons why:
Why You Shouldn't Convert to a Roth IRA - WSJ.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 28, 2009

TIME GOES BY | GRAY MATTERS: Some Basics

Scanned image of author's US Social Security card.Image via Wikipedia

by Saul Friedman

This is a good time, before the year is out, to catch up on some things financial that older Americans need to know. Much can be left to your adviser or accountant, but these days it’s better if you understand and have a hand in your finances and what’s going on with your Social Security and Medicare benefits.

Social Security
As you’ve probably heard, there will be no cost of living adjustment (COLA) or increase beginning in January for Social Security beneficiaries. This is a first, but it’s difficult to complain; the COLA in 2009 was a healthy 5.8 percent, the highest since 1982, and many Americans who worked (if they did) did not see that sort of increase in their wages, if any.

I know that the actual cost of living – housing, food, medical care and drugs - grew faster for older people than the official Consumer Price Index, which has been flat during this recession. The same inequity is involved in calculating poverty levels, which cheats some people out of benefits. Several members of Congress have promised legislation to change the CPI for the benefit of older consumers, but it won’t happen anytime soon.

Medicare
President Obama has said he’s considering a flat payment of $250 for every beneficiary in lieu of the COLA and Congress may stir to act on this. For most beneficiaries, the lack of a COLA increase means that the present Medicare Part B monthly premium of $96.40 cannot be raised because of what are called the “hold harmless” provisions in the law which say your Social Security benefits cannot be reduced.

However, for newcomers to Medicare, the standard Part B premium next year will be $110.50. And because of the Medicare Part D law of 2003, the program now provides means testing for the first time whereby more affluent beneficiaries will pay still higher premiums.

Thus, the premium for individuals with yearly incomes between $85,000 and $107,00 will be $154.70; between $107,000 and $160,000: $221; between $260,000 and $214,000: $287.30; greater than $214,000: $353.60. For couples filing joint returns, double all these income numbers to find your premium.

There are other Medicare numbers for next year: The Part B yearly deductible (now at $110) is going up to $155. While Medicare pays 100 percent of the first 20 days of skilled nursing care (usually after a hospital stay of at least three days), the co-insurance for days 21 to 100 will be a hefty $137.50 a day, which is why Medicare cannot be considered long term nursing care.

The Part A hospital deductible is going up to $1,100 per spell of illness. Hospital stays for the first 60 days are fully covered, but co-insurance is $275 a day for days 61 to 90 and $550 for days 91 to 150.

The 2010 resource limits, recently announced, for the full Low Income Subsidy to pay for Part D premiums and other costs are $8,100 for an individual and $12,910 per couple. And for the partial subsidy, $12,510 for an individual and $25,010 if married.

While Medicare does not cover long term nursing care, it does cover most of the costs of medical care for nursing home residents or during home care. Medicaid, the federal program administered by states, will cover nursing care and in a future column, we’ll explore planning for Medicaid when a loved one needs nursing care and while the spouse remains at home.

There’s been some talk on Capitol Hill that the health care reforms now before the Congress may eliminate some higher Part B premiums which, I believe, were approved by the Republican Congress in 2003 to encourage more affluent people to desert Medicare for private insurance.

One more Medicare note: Under the law, Part B premiums must pay for one-quarter the cost of Medicare services for doctors and other outpatient services. Because the Congress is expected to cancel scheduled cuts and raise fees for doctors, the Associated Press and critics of health reform have reported that this would result in higher Part B premiums during the next ten years.

The one-quarter rule and rising doctor fees have been responsible for past premium increases, but David Certner of AARP told me that the increase in the fees for doctors will be offset by other savings in the Medicare program and premium raises will be held down. We’ll see.

Mandated IRA Withdrawals
On another money issue, my sources in Congress tell me that the IRS will NOT suspend for another year, the requirement that persons over 70-1/2 must, during the year, withdraw from their IRAs and other tax-deferred savings plans a certain amount of money, based on one’s age. It’s called the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD).
Continue Reading
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

At Tiny Rates, Saving Money Costs Investors - NYTimes.com

Passbook sample for a fictional bank. It conta...Image via Wikipedia

By STEPHANIE STROM

Millions of Americans are paying a high price for a safe place to put their money: extremely low interest rates on savings accounts and certificates of deposit.

The elderly and others on fixed incomes have been especially hard hit. Many have seen returns on savings, C.D.’s and government bonds drop to niggling amounts recently, often costing them money once inflation, fees and taxes are considered.
Read More
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, September 27, 2009

401(k) Policy Changes Could Reduce the Long-term Effects of Leakage on Workers’ Retirement Savings

Logo of the United States Government Accountab...Image via Wikipedia

Under federal regulations, 401(k) participants may tap into their accrued retirement savings before retirement under certain circumstances, including hardship. This “leakage” from 401(k) accounts can result in a permanent loss of retirement savings. GAO was asked to analyze
(1) the incidence, amount, and relative significance of the different forms of 401(k) leakage;
(2) how plans inform participants about hardship withdrawal provisions, loan provisions, and options at job separation, including the short- and long-term costs of each; and
(3) how various policies may affect the incidence of leakage.

To address these matters, GAO analyzed federal and 401(k) industry data and interviewed federal officials, pension experts, and plan administrators responsible for managing the majority of 401(k) participants and assets.

What GAO Recommends
GAO is suggesting that Congress consider changing the requirement for the 6-month contribution suspension following a hardship withdrawal. In addition, GAO recommends that the Secretary of Labor promote greater participant education on the importance of preserving retirement savings, and that the Secretary of the Treasury clarify and enhance loan exhaustion provisions to ensure that participants do not initiate unnecessary leakage through hardship withdrawals. Both agencies agreed to take actions consistent with GAO’s recommendations.
Read Report
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, September 24, 2009

H.R. 3612: Retirement Savings Access Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us)

Paul BrounImage via Wikipedia

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the 10 percent penalty with respect to early retirement distributions for certain unemployed individuals.

Sponsor: Rep. Paul Broun [R-GA10]
Cosponsors: Nathan Deal [R-GA9],Jack Kingston [R-GA1], Lynn Westmoreland [R-GA3]

Full Text

Status:

Occurred: Introduced Sep 22, 2009
Occurred: Referred to Committee on Ways and Means

Read More
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Tax Rule Slams Hard-Hit IRAs, 401(k)s

By TOM LAURICELLA, Wall Street Journal (subscription required) In the past month, Congress and the Bush administration have worked feverishly to help Wall Street. Now millions of older adults are seeking last-minute help with a problem that directly affects Main Street: required withdrawals from retirement accounts. Individual taxpayers, lobbying groups and even some politicians are pressing Washington to change the rules regarding "required minimum distributions" (RMDs) from individual retirement accounts, 401(k)s and related savings vehicles. Two weeks ago, AARP, the large membership group for older adults, asked the Treasury Department to give IRA holders the option of not taking a required distribution this year. It's an idea backed by President-elect Barack Obama. The problem, says David Certner, AARP's legislative-policy director, is that time is running out. Typically, distributions must be taken by Dec. 31, and many account holders wait until November or December to withdraw the needed funds.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

A Strategy for Retirement Portfolios That Have Sagged

By DEBORAH L. JACOBS - Published: October 23, 2008 New York Times If your retirement assets took a beating in the recent stock market decline, converting a traditional I.R.A. to a Roth I.R.A. may be one of the best tax strategies this year.

Putting an I.R.A. to Work in Ventures Beyond Stocks

By DEBORAH L. JACOBS - Published: October 23, 2008 New York Times As I.R.A. portfolios are being battered, one option is to switch to investments not traditionally associated with I.R.A.’s, like real estate and new business ventures.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Investment Advice--Participants and Benficiaries; Hearing

The Department of Labor will hold a hearing on the Department's proposed regulation under provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA, or the Act), and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), relating to the provision of investment advice to participants and beneficiaries of self-directed individual account plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). DATES: The hearing will be held on October 21, 2008, beginning at 8 a.m., EST. Persons interested in presenting testimony and answering questions at the public hearing must submit requests and certain other information (as discussed below), by 3:30 p.m., EST, October 16, 2008.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Individual Retirement Accounts: Additional IRS Actions Could Help Taxpayers Facing Challenges in Complying with Key Tax Rules.

IRS data show that some taxpayers fail to comply with rules for reporting contribution deductions and taxable distributions from traditional IRAs. IRS’s National Research Program showed that nearly 15 percent of taxpayers who took traditional IRA contribution deductions as well as 15 percent of those who took taxable distributions misreported on them on their tax returns in 2001 (the most recent data available). IRS has automated enforcement programs—matching tax returns with information reported by IRA custodians—to detect and correct these types of IRA misreporting. For tax year 2004, IRS assessed additional taxes of $23.2 million for ineligible traditional IRA contribution deductions or exceeding the deduction limits and $61.1 million in taxes and penalties for early withdrawals from traditional IRAs. As partly shown by taxpayer misreporting to IRS, taxpayers face challenges in figuring how much they can contribute, navigating the various distribution rules, and rolling over their IRAs between custodians. For example, according to representatives of financial firms and advisors GAO interviewed, taxpayers may not understand that the annual contribution limit applies across traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs in combination. On the distribution side, interviewees said that older taxpayers make mistakes in determining when they must start distributions and calculating the correct amount. Interviewees identified some options for IRS to clarify guidance, such as for the combined contribution limit rule, or develop tools to help taxpayers, such as a Webbased calculator for required minimum distributions. IRS could explore actions such as requiring additional reporting by custodians or simplifying the required minimum distribution rule to strengthen compliance with this complicated rule. Other options to reduce the complexity of IRA rules, such as eliminating income limits on eligibility, pose trade-offs and could be considered in the context of broader tax reform.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Labor, SEC Join to Streamline Retirement-Fund Protection

By Christopher Twarowski Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, July 30, 2008; Page D02 The Labor Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission agreed yesterday to step up their cooperation in protecting $5.8 trillion in 401(k) plans and other retirement assets held by American workers, retirees and their families in employee benefit plans. In part, the agreement grants the Labor Department access to the SEC's investigation files and enforcement information. SEC officials will also have access to Labor's files. Both will be able to transfer this material to law enforcement agencies.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Converting an IRA Annuity to a Roth IRA

IRS Final Regulations

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). These final regulations provide guidance concerning the tax consequences of converting a non-Roth IRA annuity to a Roth IRA. These final regulations affect individuals establishing Roth IRAs, beneficiaries under Roth IRAs, and trustees, custodians and issuers of Roth IRAs.

DATES: Effective date: These final regulations are effective July 29, 2008.